<intR>²Dok [§]

Mixity after Opinion 2/15 : Judicial Confusion over Shared Competences

Thym, Daniel

In its momentous opinion about the Singapore free trade agreement, the ECJ seemed to have eliminated the option of ‘facultative’ EU-only agreements which do not embrace ISDS. It seems to me that this overlooks an important novelty of Opinion 2/15, which gave explicit judicial blessing to the option of ‘facultative’ EU-only agreements, although the Court hides the innovation behind an inconsistent use of the notion of ‘shared’ powers.

Zitieren

plumX metrics
Zitierform:

Thym, Daniel: Mixity after Opinion 2/15. Judicial Confusion over Shared Competences. 2017.

Zugriffsstatistik

Gesamt:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:
12 Monate:
Volltextzugriffe:
Metadatenansicht:

Details anzeigen

Rechte

Nutzung und Vervielfältigung:

Export